Holier Than Thou: Repetitive Songs Versus Wordy Hymns

Churches often fight over music styles. Which is best: experiential worship focused on personalized and often repetitive songs, or cognitively centered worship centered on content rich new and time-tested hymns? Who wins? Who is right and who is wrong?

I have dealt with this struggle first hand. From growing up in a Mennonite church that struggled to accept instruments in worship, to leading worship in multi-stylistic churches, the arguments remain generally the same.

Here are the common objections I have heard to simpler, shorter, more personal and experiential worship songs (Breathe; Everlasting God; Come, Now Is the Time to Worship; etc.):

  • They are light on theology and heavy on feelings.
  • They are repetitious (7-11 songs, meaning 7 words repeated 11 times).
  • They have not “stood the test of time.”
  • They are heavy on clichés and devoid of literary excellence.

Here are the common objections I hear to more cognitive and content rich hymns (Great Is Thy Faithfulness; Immortal, Invisible; Praise to the Lord, the Almighty; etc.):

  • They stay in the head and never reach the heart.
  • They are too “wordy.”
  • The language is outdated and inaccessible.
  • The style of music is outdated.

When talking about these subjects I find it helpful to step back and take in the larger view.

What kind of music is mentioned in the Bible, and does God give us any directions about what to sing? What songs have actually stood the test of time, and are the worship arguments of today mirrored anywhere in history?

God, the Bible, and Music

The Bible mentions all types of instruments and voices, short and long songs, theological and personal songs, songs for every mood and event in life, and repetitive and content rich songs.

The first music mentioned in the Bible is instrumental. Jubal was a maker of flutes and stringed instruments, Genesis says.

David and other leaders wrote the largest book in the Bible, the Psalms. This book has both the shortest (Psalm 117) and the longest chapter in the Bible (Psalm 119) and both are profound. The tone of the music ranges from wildly celebrative to subdued, depressed, and raging. Some of the language is lofty and theological, even prophetic. Other psalms are intensely personal prayers. Some psalms contain regular refrains every other line or so.

In the New Testament Paul encourages us to sing psalms, hymns and spiritual songs, making melody in our hearts to the Lord. The word for “hymn” actually denotes music accompanied by stringed instruments. Psalms obviously came from the book of the Bible of the same name, and spiritual songs probably were Scripture songs.

Revelation is full of worship, but most of it is extremely repetitive. The elders and the flying beasts around the throne say one or two phrases over and over throughout eternity without stopping. The great multitude sings a song with a very short text.

Music and the Litmus Test of Time

The mass texts and A Mighty Fortress are great examples of ancient, time-tested music. These pieces of music are heavy in content and theology and have strong, crafted shapes and melodies.

The Hallelujah Chorus is a classic, yet it has very few words repeated many, many times. The theology is simple, ad the text is based on the worship scenes in Revelation.

Great Is Thy Faithfulness and How Great Thou Art have been around less than two centuries, but they are staples of worship because of the beauty and transcendence of their language.

Many more hymns, however, have been lost to time. Isaac Watts wrote 750 hymns; comparatively very few of them are in use today. Jan Pieterszoon Sweelinck set every Psalm to music in elegant, complex choral settings hundreds of years ago.

New music has always been suspect. Many renounced the revivalist music that came out in the late 1800s because it was too experiential and light on theology. Yet these hymns brought us many of the testimony hymns we know today, such as Higher Ground and All the Way My Savior Leads Me.

Making Sense of It All

Perhaps you know where I am heading with this conversation. My feelings on the matter can be summed up in this sentence:

Just as the wide diversity of the people whom God has called to be his own demonstrates the rich and varied love of the Savior, so the span of musical styles from pre-Classical to the newest pop song reveals his profound message.

God is no respecter of persons or styles. If a style bothers you, I challenge you to find something positive about that style. If God is able to use you and me, he can definitely use any style of music he chooses.

What style of music is most challenging for you, and why? What positive aspect can you discover in that style?

6 thoughts on “Holier Than Thou: Repetitive Songs Versus Wordy Hymns

  1. My thoughts on what I find challenging are also enlightening about some strengths and weaknesses of each style. I find hymns to be challenging in corporate worship because I don’t have time to think about what I am saying and I feel a little inauthentic singing words that I don’t have time to be sure I truly mean. With the simplicity and repetition of contemporary music I have time to think deeply about what I am saying. Even some old songs can be profound in their simple message that bears some contemplation, ie., “Jesus Loves Me, This I Know”. On the other hand, I have found that hymns work best for personal worship time. I have time to think about their content in personal worship and the theology comforts and instructs me. For example, I often use “A Mighty Fortress” when praying over spiritual battles. The majority of contemporary music is hard to sing alone without the accompaniment and works best for worship only in corporate settings with the instrumentation. I think the thing I am realizing is that, if we want to be equipping people for personal worship, using corporate worship to familiarize people with old hymns has great value. Also, additional value should be placed on new hymn-like songs that can be reasonably sung a cappella, ie. “Bless the Lord, O My Soul”.

    • Good thoughts, Sally, in finding the value of different types of music in both personal and corporate settings. I imagine some of what is valuable for personal worship depends on a person’s surroundings when they were growing up as well.

  2. Interesting discussion, Maurice. I don’t think one style is better or more reverent than the other. I personally prefer a contemporary style. I’m a “feeler”, and have always been emotionally impacted by music. Style of worship, like anything, can easily become an idol. If I become too focused on the style of music being played rather than focusing on my heart worshiping the Lord it becomes an issue. However, contemporary music, and heartfelt lyrics really move me, and therefore enhance that special time of worshiping the Lord with the church family.

  3. Great article. I enjoy all styles. The one thing I have noticed in visiting a number of different churches is that with any style, it has to be worship to The Lord. I have been to a number if ‘worship’ services that come off more as a concert and a showcase for the musicians.

    With whatever style people choose, we need to make sure that we are pointing to Christ and glorifying Him. Once it becomes about how talented the musicians are we have lost out focus. I was at a service recently and with the fog machine, the lasers and lights, I found myself asking ‘where is God in all of this?’

    It doesn’t help when the lyrics are unsinkable either. Some songs are great for a solo, but trying to get a congregation to sing it is sometimes very tricky.

    As we do with all things, we need to be prayerful wen choosing songs for a service and ask ourselves if it will help people to see Him better and to draw people closer to Him.

    We live in a day where we have many great choices- some great old songs and some great new ones

  4. Great balanced article on this subject brother! Thank you for such a thorough, detailed outlineon this subject…blessings friend!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s